| （华南师范大学 法学院，广东 广州 510006） 摘 要：近年来，随着世界竞技体育的蓬勃发展，竞技体育的过度暴力行为时有发生，其社会危害性正在凸显。美国、加拿大作为竞技体育大国，在认定和处理过度体育暴力方面有其独到的认识和经验，其处置方式包括立法、判例法和联盟3种。刑事检控体育过度暴力行为具有可行性，但会遇到相当大的障碍，包括观念障碍、宪法障碍，其中最大的障碍是“同意原则”。同意作为抗辩事由，可有效阻却刑事责任。我国在处理此类行为时，没有统一的标准。借鉴美、加的经验，建议我国应从4个方面逐步完善，即完善体育专项立法、强化司法、推动体育联盟自治以及加强竞技规则的科学性研究。 |
WANG Shui-ming，YE Jian-feng
| （School of Law，South China Normal University，Guangzhou 510006，China） Abstract: In recent years, with the booming of world competitive sports, the behaviors of excessive violence in competitive sports occurred from time to time, and their social hazardness is becoming perceivable. As a big nation of competitive sports, the United States and Canada have unique understanding about and experiences in determin-ing the nature of and penalties for excessive violence, their ways to deal with such behaviors include legislation, case law and league. Criminal prosecution of the behaviors of excessive violence in sports is feasible, but will en-counter substantial obstacles, which include conceptional obstacles and constitutional obstacles, in which the big-gest obstacle is the “principle of consent”. Consent as a ground for defense can effectively exclude criminal liabili-ties. In China, there is no unified standard for dealing with such behaviors. By referring to the experiences of the United States and Canada, the author proposed that China should make improvements gradually in 4 aspects, i.e. perfecting sport specific legislation, intensifying jurisdiction, promoting the autonomy of sports leagues, and strengthening the scientific study of competition rules. |
下载本期全文：点击下载