| （华东师范大学 体育与健康学院，上海 200241） 摘 要：描述了在西方体育社会学中两种主要的体育产生根源——“体育起源古典时代说”和“体育起源近代说”的主旨。在此基础上，结合这两种体育起源说的基本争论和身体与社会、个人和体育间的关联，形成身体维度介入体育起源说分析的可能性与必要性。由此在身体维度的视野下，凸显了体育起源古典时代说的身体机械论的特征，凸显了体育起源近代说中后现代思维模式下，对身体的理解及身体中介性、场域性的特征。最后，通过反思古典时代说与近代说中存在的对身体“虚化”抑或“实化”的两种预设，检讨两者对身体的认识遮蔽。在此基础上，以布迪厄惯习理论为理论出发点，借助体育惯习的概念对身体功能与身体意义的融合作用，尝试构建体育起源惯习说的理论解释框架，阐明体育起源是一种惯习形成的过程。 |
GAO Qiang
| （School of Physical Education，East China Normal University，Shanghai 200241，China） Abstract: The author described the tenets of two important roots for sport generation in western sports sociology – “the theory of sport origination in ancient times” and “the theory of sport origination in modern times”. On such a basis, according to the basis disputes about the two theories about sport origination as well as the correlations be-tween the body and the society, and between individuals and sport, the author formed the possibility and necessity to analyze theories about sport origination with the body dimension involved. Then, from the perspective of the body dimension, the author highlighted the characteristics of the body mechanism of the theory of sport origination in an-cient times, as well as the interpretation of the body and the body’s intermediation and field domain characteristics under the post-modern thinking mode in the theory of sport origination in modern times. Lastly, by retrospecting such two presuppositions as body “virtualization” and body “substantialization” existing in the theory of sport origination in modern times, the author analyzed the screening of these two presuppositions from body recognition. On such a basic, by basing his theoretical ground on Bourdieu’s habit theory, and with the help of the fusion action of the sports habit concept on body functions and body meanings, the author tried to build a theoretical framework for interpreting the habit theory about sport origination, and explained that sport origination is a process of habit formation. |
下载本期全文：点击下载