| （1.中国石油大学 体育部，北京 102249；2.浙江财经学院 体军部，浙江 杭州 310018） 摘 要：对《对“中西体育文化差异论”的质疑》一文的相关论断和方法论提出质疑，指出该文存在的若干“硬伤”：第一，将西方中世纪下限定在公元1350年；第二，强行对斯格勒的理论“削足适履”。同时认为，不能将依附于宗教形态的身体活动形式作为中西体育的共同起源；运用斯宾格勒“比较形态方法”进行中西体育文化比较研究不可取；中西体育文化的差异客观存在。明辨、承认中西体育文化之间的差异，有利于我国传统体育的保护与发展。 关 键 词：体育文化；文化差异；方法论；中西方文化比较 中图分类号：G80 文献标识码：A 文章编号：1006-7116(2008)03-0013-05 |
ZHAO Jing-hui1，HAN Kun2
| （1.Department of Physical Education，China University of Petroleum，Beijing 102249，China；2. Department of Physical Education ＆ Military，Zhejiang University of Finance and Economics，Hangzhou 310018，China） Abstract: The authors raised several queries about relevant conclusions drawn and the methodology used in the ar-ticle of Queries about the “theory of the differences between Chinese and western sports cultures”, pointing out that there are several “critical mistakes” in the article: 1) the lower limit of Middle Ages was set to a.d. 1350; 2) the Spengler theory was applied in a Procrustean way. The authors also put forward the following opinions: the pattern of physical activities attached to a religious form cannot be considered as the common origin of Chinese and west-ern sports cultures; it is not appropriate to make a comparative study of Chinese and western sports cultures by ap-plying the “form comparison method” set forth by Spengler; the differences between Chinese and western sports cultures exist objectively. It is conducive to the protection and development of traditional Chinese sport to identify and admit the differences between Chinese and western sports cultures. |
下载本期全文：点击下载