| （湖北大学 体育学院，湖北 武汉 430062） 摘 要：采用秩和比 (Runk Sum Ration)综合评价法和相关分析法，对2005-2006赛季CBA常规赛15支球队攻防能力进行量化评价，得出以下结论：(1)CBA参赛队进攻能力分布于3个等级，防守能力分布于4个等级，攻防综合能力分布于5个等级；(2)CBA参赛队在进攻能力等级相同下，防守能力与常规赛名次正相关；在防守能力等级相同下，进攻能力与常规赛名次不相关。(3)CBA参赛队的攻防能力决定一个队的整体实力与联赛名次；(4)CBA攻防综合能力南区球队强于北区球队；(5)CBA参赛队攻守平衡型球队成绩最好，守强于攻型球队成绩次之，攻强于守型球队成绩最差。 关 键 词：中国男子篮球职业联赛；进攻能力；防守能力；综合评价 中图分类号：G841 文献标识码：A 文章编号：1006-7116(2007)02-0108-05 |
LI Ke-ke，GE Yao，SHI Xian-li，XU Zi-shen
| (College of Physical Education，Hubei University，Wuhan 430062，China) Abstract:The authors collected and sorted the technical statistics of 15 basketball teams competing in the regular CBA tournament 2005-2006, carried out quantified evaluation on the offense and defense capability of the teams by applying the rank sum ratio comprehensive evaluation method and correlation analysis method, and drew the fol-lowing conclusions: 1) the teams’ offense capability is distributed in three levels, their defense capability is distrib-uted in four levels, and their comprehensive offense and defense capability is distributed in five levels; 2) for the teams with the same level of offense capability, their position in the regular tournament is positively correlative to their defense capability, while for the teams with the same level of defense capability, their position in the regular tournament is not correlative to their offense capability; 3) the offense capability of a team therein decides the over-all strength of that team and its position in the tournament; 4) the comprehensive offense and defense capability of teams in the south China region is stronger than that of teams in the north China region; 5) the teams with balanced offense and defense have the best performance, the teams with better defense than offense have the second best per-formance, and the teams with better offense than defense have the poorest performance. |
下载本期全文：点击下载