郑嘉昕，黄汉升
(福建师范大学 体育科学学院，福建 福州 350117)
摘 要：研究方法的创新和发展是建构体育学自主知识体系的内生动力。选取第5届至第13届全国体育科学大会会议论文共36 198篇，辅以70 275篇CSSCI来源期刊论文和2 608篇博士学位论文，运用社会网络分析法、词频分析法、共词分析法，考察不同成果类型研究方法的应用特点。研究表明，会议论文是探究信息科技学科群方法与技术等前沿方法的重要平台，对于推动方法创新至关重要。然而，不同成果类型所采用的研究方法存在差异，反映出会议论文对前沿方法的快速响应与期刊论文、博士学位论文审慎取向之间的张力。前沿性、创新性的研究方法在提出之后，较难转化为可复用、可推广的研究工具，体育学研究方法的更新迭代延滞。方法创新是知识创新、理论创新的重要基础，未来应致力于推动学科方法创新、培养科学方法素养、树立规范方法意识。
关 键 词：体育学；研究方法；全国体育科学大会；比较研究
中图分类号：G80-3 文献标志码：A 文章编号：1006-7116(2026)02-0093-10
Comparative study on the application difference of research methods in Chinese physical education and sport science: Investigation and analysis based on conference papers, journal articles, and dissertations
ZHENG Jiaxin，HUANG Hansheng
(School of Physical Education and Sports Science，Fujian Normal University，Fuzhou 350117，China)
Abstract: Innovation and development of research methods will provide the internal driving force for constructing an independent knowledge system in physical education and sport science. Based on 36 198 papers from the 5th to the 13th national sport science conference, supplemented by 70 275 journal articles indexed by Chinese Social Science Citation Index and 2 608 doctoral dissertations, and word frequency analysis, co-word analysis, and social network analysis were employed to investigate the application features of research methods across different types of scholarly outputs. The findings show that conference papers serve as a key platform for experimenting with frontier approaches, especially methods and technologies drawn from information and computing disciplines, and thus play a pivotal role in promoting methodological innovation. However, certain difference of research methods used by different types of scholarly outputs, which reveals a tension between the rapid response of conference papers to cutting-edge methods and the more cautious orientation of the latter two carriers. Many cutting-edge and innovative research methods, once proposed, will be not further developed into stable and widely reusable research tools, and the renewal and iterative evolution of research methods in physical education and sport science will be delayed. Since methodological innovation as an fundamental basis for knowledge and theory innovation, the future work should focus on promoting methodological innovation in discipline, cultivating literacy in scientific methods, establishing awareness of standardized methods.
Keywords: physical education and sport science；research methods；national sports science conference；comparative study