A study on key issues in the construction of the sports arbitration system LI Zhi1，WANG Junhui2
(1.School of Law，Fuzhou University，Fuzhou 350108，China；2.School of Law，Tsinghua University，Beijing 100084，China)
Abstract:From the beginning of the establishment and operation of the China Sports Arbitration Commission, it has faced a number of difficulties in the application of arbitration procedures and rules, focusing on the following aspects: whether it is more appropriate for disputes over athletes' work contracts to be under the jurisdiction of the Labour Arbitration Commission or that of the Sports Arbitration Commission, and how to strengthen the connection and coordination with domestic and international dispute resolution mechanisms, and how to fully guarantee the timeliness of sports dispute resolution. In this regard, the study holds that in view of the advantages of sports arbitration in terms of jurisdiction, enforcement and professionalism, it is more appropriate for the Sports Arbitration Commission to have jurisdiction over athletes' work contract disputes. Sports organizations also need to actively explore the construction of a diversified internal dispute resolution mechanism, and the Sports Arbitration Commission should exercise its jurisdiction of self-adjudication appropriately, so as to make good use of the interface between the internal dispute resolution mechanism and sports arbitration. At the same time, it should pay attention to new developments and changes in the international sports dispute resolution mechanism, ensure coordination between the international sports dispute resolution mechanism and sports arbitration, and also respond positively to the requirement of timeliness in the handling of sports disputes, so as to form a system of rules on provisional measures consisting of "laws, rules and methods".