(武汉大学 法学院，湖北 武汉 430072) 摘 要：孙志强等人与“城俱杯”组委会纠纷案，涉及对《体育法》第32条中竞技体育纠纷含义的准确把握，也映射出当下我国体育司法介入大众体育赛事纠纷的困境。大众体育赛事纠纷属于民事争议，不适用《体育法》第32条调整。基于对参赛选手权利的保护，司法应当适时介入纠纷，运用优等悬赏广告的评定人规则与不干涉比赛结果原则，妥善处理大众体育赛事纠纷的特殊问题。同时，为兼容大众体育赛事纠纷的特殊性和法院审理案件的一般性，建议通过明确受案范围、优化体育专家辅助人制度、重视纠纷的法庭调解等措施，完善大众体育赛事纠纷的司法程序。 |
YU Hong-xian
(School of Law，Wuhan University，Wuhan 430072，China) Abstract: The case of Sun Zhiqiang in a dispute with Chengju Cup sports club involves the accurate meaning of‘competitive sports disputes in the Article 32 of the Sports Law, which also reflects the dilemma of China's sports judicial intervention in the mass sports events dispute, which belongs to civil dispute and the Article 32 of the Sports Law is not suitable for adjusting. Based on the rights of the contestants, the judiciary should intervene in disputes in an appropriate occasion, and using the rules of appraisers and the principle of non-interference in the result of competition, which can properly deal with the special problems of public sports events dispute. Meanwhile, in order to be compatible with the particularity of mass sports events dispute and the generality of dealing with cases by the court, it is suggested to adopt the following measures, including clarifying the scope of the cases, optimizing the system of auxiliary personnel with sports experts, and paying attention to the mediation of the court in disputes, so as to improve the judicial procedures of the public sports events dispute. |
下载本期全文：点击下载