（1.广州体育学院，广东 广州 510500；2.河南科技学院，河南 新乡 453003） 摘 要：通过DEA模型中的CCR模型、BCC模型、SE-DEA模型以及Malmquist模型，从横向和纵向两个维度对我国31个省市区体育公共服务绩效进行了综合评价。研究表明：(1)北京、天津、上海等17个省市区的体育公共服务效率较高，河北、内蒙古、青海等14个省市区的体育公共服务绩效较低；(2)云南、陕西、贵州等技术效率偏低，青海的规模效率最低；(3)DEA弱有效省市区都存在不同的指标投入冗余现象，体育行政人员编制和从业人员人数两项指标存在较大冗余，所有产出指标方面都存在产出不足的现象；(4)基于体育公共服务有效的省市区进行综合效率排名的位次是：北京、黑龙江、江西、山西、河南、上海、江苏、安徽、辽宁、浙江、宁夏、广西、天津、山东、湖北、甘肃、吉林；(5)中国体育公共服务效率2009—2015年出现微弱上升趋势，上升了2.4%，而技术进步增加了2.9%。
|
WANG Jing1，JIA Hong-zhou2，CHEN Qi1，LU Shu-ting1
（1.Guangzhou Sport University，Guangzhou 510500，China；2.Henan Insititue of Science and Technology，Xingxiang 453003，China) Abstract: Through the CCR model, the BCC model, the SE-DEA model and the Malmquist model in the DEA model, the authors comprehensively evaluated the sports public service performance of different provinces in China from the hori-zontal and vertical dimensions, and revealed the following findings: 1) the sports public service efficiency of 17 provinces or cities such as Beijing, Tianjin and Shanghai was relatively high, the sports public service performance of 14 provinces or cities such as Hebei, Inner Mongolia and Qinghai was relatively low; 2) the technical efficiency of provinces or cities such as Yunnan, Shanxi and Guizhou was on the low side, the scale efficiency of Qinghai was the lowest; 3) all the DEA weak effective provinces or cities had different signs of index input redundancy, having a bigger redundancy in such two indexes as sports administrative personnel number and employee number, and all the output indexes had the sign of output defi-ciency; 4) the order of comprehensive efficiency rankings based on sports public service effective provinces or cities is as follows: Beijing, Heilongjiang, Jiangxi, Shanxi, Henan, Shanghai, Jiangsu, Anhui, Liaoning, Zhejiang, Ningxia, Guangxi, Tianjin, Shandong, Hubei, Gansu, Jilin; 5) China’s sports public service efficiency between 2009 and 2015 showed a trend of slight increasing, increased by 2.4%, while technical advancement increased by 2.9%. |
下载本期全文：点击下载