| （1.湖南工业大学 体育学院，湖南 株洲 412008；2.苏州大学 体育学院，江苏 苏州 215021；3.清华大学 体育部，北京 100084；4. 大连理工大学 文法学院，辽宁 盘锦 124221） 摘 要：“诺斯悖论”从属于新制度经济学领域中的制度创新理论，描述的是国家与经济发展间复杂且矛盾的关系。在政府购买公共体育服务领域，政府购买服务与体育社会组织发展也存在“诺斯悖论”。政府购买服务是体育社会组织发展的关键，给以体育社会组织财政保障、活动空间、合法性资源；与之同时，也是体育社会组织发展的羁绊，致使体育社会组织主体附庸化、服务低效化、发展异化。究其根源，政府行为内在复杂逻辑张力之生成、规则阙如诱发二者合作契约的失位、权力失衡呈现非对称性的相互依赖关系是“诺斯悖论”问题的主要生成机理。因此，需要政府更新认知图式，与体育社会组织建构“伙伴”关系；合作契约关系复位，强化、完善政社合作规则建设；增大体育社会组织权力，促均衡性权力关系之生成等路径来规避政府购买公共体育服务对体育社会组织的不良影响，实现体育社会组织的良性发展。 |
ZHANG Feng-biao1，2，WANG Jia-hong2，WANG Song3，CUI Jia-qi4
| （1.School of Physical Education，Hunan University of Technology，Zhuzhou 412008，China；2.School of Physical Education，Soochow University，Suzhou 215021，China；3.Department of Physical Education，Tsinghua University，Beijing 100084，China；4.School of Literature and Law，Dalian University of Technology，Panjin 124221，China) Abstract: The “North Paradox” belongs to an institutional innovation theory in the new institutional economics area, what it describes is the complicated and contradictory relationship between a country and economic devel-opment. In the area of the government purchasing public sports services, there is the “North Paradox” too be-tween the government purchasing services and sports social organization development. The government pur-chasing services is the key to sports social organization development, giving sports social organizations financial assurance, activity space and legitimate resources; in the mean time, it is also a fetter for sports social organiza-tion development, causing the sports social organization subjects to become dependent, low service efficiency and development dissimilation. As for the causes, the generation of intrinsic complex logic tension of govern-ment behaviors, rules lacking inducing the misplacement of cooperative contracts between the two parties, and power unbalance presenting an asymmetric mutual dependent relationship, are the main generation mechanisms of the “North Paradox” problem. Therefore, the government should update its cognitive schema, establish a “partner” relationship with sports social organizations, reset cooperative contract relationship, intensify and per-fect government and society cooperation rule construction, prevent the adverse influence of government pur-chasing public sports services on sports social organizations and realize the benign development of sports social organizations by ways of increasing the power of sports social organizations, promoting the generation of a bal-anced power relationship, etc. |
下载本期全文：点击下载