| （厦门大学 法学院，福建 厦门 361005） 摘 要：国际体育仲裁院(CAS)在里约奥运会上首次设置了专门解决奥运会兴奋剂案件的反兴奋剂部门(Anti-Doping Division，ADD)，并将其定位为一审仲裁机构。作为相互独立的仲裁部门，ADD与AHD(临时仲裁庭)在仲裁庭的组成、仲裁员名单的确定、仲裁庭的广泛自由裁量权、程序参与人之间的沟通方式、官方语言、裁决期限等方面有着相似的规定。但ADD作为一审仲裁机构的定位使得两者的差异主要体现在有无“穷尽内部救济”的限制，能否直接将案件移送至CAS总部裁决，临时措施的方式，裁决的最终效力等方面。从异同中依然可以看出CAS仲裁体系遵循一般法律原则的适用，如程序正义原则的认可；同时也坚持对具有体育专业特色的新原则的创设，如绝对严格责任原则的适用等。因此，法律基本原则和体育专业规则的交错适用和创设是包括体育仲裁规则在内的全球体育法的主要构建模式。 |
LIU Yun
| （School of Law，Xiamen University，Xiamen 361005，China) Abstract: For the first time in the Rio Olympic Games, CAS set up a special department called ADD (Anti-Doping Divi-sion) to specialize in solving Olympic doping cases, and orientated it as an arbitration institution of first instance. As mutu-ally independent departments, ADD and AHD (Ad Hoc Division) have similar stipulations in terms of arbitration court composition, arbitrator panel determination, arbitration court discretionary discretion, way of communication between procedure participants, official language and ruling period etc. However, the orientation of ADD as an arbitration institu-tion of first instance makes the differences between the two divisions mainly embody in the followings: if there is an “in-ternal relief exhaustion” limitation; if the cases can be sent directly to the CAS headquarters for ruling, way of ad hoc measures, final effect of ruling, etc. From the differences and similarities, it can still be seen that the CAS arbitration sys-tem follows the application of general legal principles, such as the recognition of the procedure justice principle, and in the mean time, adheres to the establishment of new principles with sports specialty features, such as the application of the strict liability principle, etc. Therefore, the cross application and establishment of basic legal principles and sports specialty rules is the main mode of establishment of sports arbitration rules included global sports law. |
下载本期全文：点击下载