| （山西财经大学 体育学院，山西 太原 030006） 摘 要：对近20年来体育统考模式改革进行了回顾，研究认为：“身体素质”模式背离了高考改革初衷，表现出较差的社会效益，因此急需变革。“身体素质+非专项基本运动技能+专项”模式相对较好，但也存在身体素质考查不全面及测试工作效率低的问题。“X+1+1”模式是在“身体素质+非专项基本运动技能+专项”模式基础上的改革，其优点是考查内容全面，能够引导考生全面训练，更加有利于高校体教、社体专业人才选拔与培养。此外，其设计理念符合新一轮高考改革价值取向，也符合中学体育改革实际，更加有利于社会公平。影响评价结果表明，“X+1+1”模式的经济效益与社会效益均好于“身体素质+非专项基本运动技能+专项”模式，可作为未来体育统考模式的一种备选模式。 |
WANG Shu-hong，GU Chen-xu
| （School of Physical Education，Shanxi University of Finance and Economics，Taiyuan 030006，China) Abstract: The authors reviewed unified university physical education entrance examination mode reform in recent 20 years, and drew the following conclusions: the “physical quality” mode deviated from the original intention of univer-sity entrance examination reform, showed poor social benefits, therefore, needed to be changed urgently. Compara-tively speaking; the “physical quality + non specialized basic sports skills + specialized” mode is optimal, but has such problems as incomprehensive physical quality examinations and low test working efficiency; the “X+1+1” mode is the reforming of the “physical quality + non specialized basic sports skills + specialized” mode, its biggest advantages are that its examination contents are comprehensive, that it can guide examinee comprehensive training, and that it is more conducive to the selection and cultivation of university physical education and social physical education professionals; moreover, its design conception meets the value orientation of the new round of university entrance examination re-form, also meets middle school physical education reform reality, is more conduce to social equity. The impact evalua-tion results indicate that the economic benefits and social benefits of the “X+1+1” mode are all better than those of the “physical quality + non specialized basic sports skills + specialized” mode, can be used as an alternative mode when selecting a unified physical education examination mode in the future. |
下载本期全文：点击下载