| （东北师范大学 历史文化学院，吉林 长春 130024） 摘 要：通过对3部由中国学者主编的《体育史》进行分析，借鉴“全球史”与“区域史”等体育史学理论，归纳了当代中国体育史叙事的转向路径：由国别型“区域体育史”的书写，到时序型“全球体育史”的萌芽，再到专题型“全球体育史”的成熟。作为叙事策略，“全球体育史”与“区域体育史”在展现人类悠久的体育传统与丰富的地方特色领域各有长短，应相互借鉴。优秀的体育史叙事，应成功协调叙事中的“时间”要素与“空间”要素。中国的“全球体育史”应体现中国话语风格，再现中国体育对于形成世界体育多元传统及全球体育交往的独特历史贡献。 |
WANG Shao-li
（School of History and Culture，Northeast Normal University，Changchun 130024，China) Abstract: By analyzing the three versions of Sports History written by Chinese scholars since the 21st century, and by referring to such sports history theories as “global history” and “regional history”, the author summed up the turning paths of modern Chinese sports history narration: from the practice of “regional sports history” based on country, to the germination of “global sports history” based on timeline, and then to the maturity of “global sports history” based on subject. As narrative strategies, “global sports history” and “region sports history” have respective pros and cons in terms of presenting mankind’s long lasting sports traditions and rich local features, should be re-ferred to mutually. Excellent sports history narration should successfully coordinate the “time” and “space” elements in narration. Chinese “global sports history” should present Chinese phrasing style, and represent Chinese sport’s unique contributions to global sports exchange and the formation of world sport’s diversified traditions. |
下载本期全文：点击下载