| （中国人民大学 法学院，北京 100872） 摘 要：我国学界一般认为“体育权”是一项基本权利，但论证往往缺乏规范基础，且通常选择“义务反推权利”和“未列举宪法权利”的理论路径亦值得商榷。体育权应当是宪法已列举的基本权利，而“基本权利双重性质”学说对建构、分析宪法上的体育权很有意义。作为基本权利的体育权兼具主观权利和客观法的双重性质，以及防御权、受益权、客观价值秩序3大功能，与实践相结合，既有利于保障公民体育权利，亦有助于国家在体育领域的依宪治理。 |
HUANG Xin
| （School of Law，Renmin University of China，Beijing 100872，China) Abstract: Generally, the academic community in China considers “sports right” as a basic right, but usually, there is a lack of a norm foundation for demonstration, and such theoretical paths as “reasoning backward from obligations to rights” and “unlisted constitutional rights” normally chosen deserve to be questioned. Sports right should be a ba-sic right that has already been listed in the constitution, while the theory about “the dual nature of basic rights” is quite significant for sports right in terms of constructing and analyzing the constitution. Sports right as a basic right has the dual nature of subjective rights and objective laws, and such 3 functions as defense right, beneficial right and objective value order; when combined with practice, it is conducive to ensuring citizen sports right, and to the state governing the sports field according to the constitution. |
下载本期全文：点击下载