| （四川文理学院 体育学院，四川 达州 635000） 摘 要：2015年新版《世界反兴奋剂条例》规定，政府有制定反兴奋剂组织和政府之间、反兴奋剂组织之间合作以及分享信息法律的义务，而我国还没有此法律条例。目前，《世界反兴奋剂条例》及国际标准和世界反兴奋剂机构的指导文件提出合作及信息分享法的制定原则和主要内容，有的国家也通过专门反兴奋剂立法、一般性立法和备忘录的形式，规定反兴奋剂工作中的合作与信息分享，但在执行中仍然遇到公共权力机构合作与信息分享的动力不足、执法人员对兴奋剂不熟悉、以数据和隐私保护法作为不分享信息的借口等障碍。建议我国立法时，在信息产权背景下优化信息分享制度、建立反兴奋剂组织人员咨询顾问制度，将反兴奋剂需求作为信息保密的例外。 |
JING Wen
| （School of Physical Education，Sichuan University of Arts and Science，Dazhou 635000，China) Abstract: The 2015 version of the World Anti-Doping Code stipulates that a government has the obligation to es-tablish laws about the cooperation and information sharing between anti-doping organizations and the government, and between anti-doping organizations, yet there have been no such legal regulations in China. At present, the World Anti-Doping Code, international standards, and the guiding documents of the World Anti-Doping Agency, have set forth cooperation and information sharing law establishment principles and main contents. Some countries have passed the forms of dedicated anti-doping legislation, general legislation and memorandums, and stipulated coop-eration and information sharing in anti-doping work, however, during execution, they still encountered obstacles, such as that public authorities had insufficient motives for cooperation and information sharing, that law enforcers were unfamiliar with dopes, and that data and privacy protection laws were used as excuses for not sharing informa-tion, and such. The author suggested that during legislation China should, under the background of information property, optimize the information sharing system, establish an anti-doping organization personnel consultant sys-tem, and set anti-doping need as an exception of information privacy. |
下载本期全文：点击下载