(衡阳师范学院 体育系,湖南 衡阳 421008) 摘 要:体育人类学研究对象的认识过程大致以2000年为界:之前是“民族体育”,之后是“原生态身体运动”。体育人类学研究对象具有4个变化特征:从整体到局部;从逻辑演绎到实证研究;从隐喻到凸显;从理论到实践。体育人类学学科研究对象应该是“杀鬼的原生态身体运动”,而与音乐人类学、舞蹈人类学和杂技人类学等学科研究对象的“通神的原生态身体运动”、“娱神的原生态身体运动”和“收魂的原生态身体运动”区隔开来。体育人类学具体研究对象也应该在两方面得到独立:一方面是杀鬼的原生态身体运动与其他文化之间的相互关系;另一方面是杀鬼的原生态身体运动与体育文化之间的相互关系;前者带有主观的人文性质,后者带有客观的科学性质。 |
JIANG De-long
(Department of Physical Education,Hengyang Normal University,Hengyang 421008,China) Abstract: The process of cognition of the research object of sports anthropology is roughly bounded by the year 2000: it was “national sports” before that year, or “primitive ecological body movement” after that year. The re-search object of sports anthropology has 4 characteristics of changing: from whole to local, from deductive to em-pirical, from metaphorical to prominent, from theoretical to practical. The research object of sports anthropology should be “ghost-killing primitive ecological body movement”, differentiated from “god-communicating primitive ecological body movement”, “god-entertaining primitive ecological body movement” and “soul-capturing primitive ecological body movement” as the research objects of music anthropology, dance anthropology and acrobatic an-thropology. During specific research, the research object of sports anthropology should be independent in two as-pects: one is the mutual relation between ghost-killing primitive ecological body movement and other culture, the other one is the mutual relation between ghost-killing primitive ecological body movement and sports culture; the former has subjective humanistic nature, while the latter has objective scientific nature. |
下载本期全文:点击下载