| （华南师范大学 体育科学学院，广东 广州 510006） 摘 要：无论是晚清曾被推崇一时的“张三丰创太极拳说”，还是20世纪30年代初由学者唐豪提出的“陈王廷创太极拳说”，都明显偏离了太极拳技术演变与发展的客观主线，而缺乏对戚继光在明代创编并收录在其著作《纪效新书》中的“拳经三十二势”长拳与晚清成熟的太极拳技术体系之间渊源的重视与考究。太极拳历史的探索长期陷入神仙崇拜、主观推断、人物附会，甚至故弄虚玄的怪圈。研究认为太极拳源于戚氏“三十二势长拳”，传于炮捶，成于“十三势”，而这一演变与发展历史明显被忽略和扭曲。 |
ZHANG Zhi-yong
| （School of Physical Education，South China Normal University，Guangzhou 510006，China） Abstract: Both “the theory of Taoist ZHANG San-feng founding Tijiquan” highly believed by people in the late Qing dynasty, and “the theory of CHEN Wang-ting founding Taijiquan” put forward by scholar TANG Hao in the early 1930’s, have significantly deviated from the objective main course of evolution and development of Taijiquan techniques, lacking in paying attention to and probing into the origin of relationships objectively existing between the technical systems of Changquan with “32 boxing moves” established by QI Ji-guang in the Ming dynasty and recorded in his book titled Ji Xiao Xin Shu and Taijiquan maturing in the late Qing dynasty. Over the years the ex-ploration of the history of Taijiquan have fallen into a strange loop of worshipping immortals, drawing conclusions subjectively, describing characters groundlessly and even mystifying things deliberately. The history of evolution and development of Taijiquan originating from Changquan with “32 boxing moves” established by QI, being inher-ited as cannon fist boxing, and finally forming “13 moves”, was obviously neglected and twisted. |
下载本期全文：点击下载