(1.湖南城市学院 体育系,湖南 益阳 413000;2.湖南师范大学 体育学院,湖南 长沙 410081) 摘 要:采用辨别任务形式比较运动员与普通大学生的返回抑制时程特征。实验为“3×2×3”的混合设计,组间变量为被试组别(篮球运动员、蹦床运动员和普通大学生各16人),组内变量依次为靶子位置(线索化位置和非线索化位置)和线索化开始到靶子出现的时间间隔(SOA,400、600、800 ms)。结果发现:篮球运动员、蹦床运动员和普通大学生分别在SOA为400、800和600 ms开始出现返回抑制。说明与普通大学生相比,篮球运动员表现出较强的抑制效应,能在较短的SOA中出现返回抑制,而蹦床运动员没有表现出返回抑制能力的优势,需要在更长的SOA中才能出现返回抑制。返回抑制对篮球运动员的心理选材和训练监控、定向具有一定的参考价值。 |
OU Yue-shan1,YANG Qing1,LI Yan-ling2
(1.Department of Physical Education,Hunan City University,Yiyang 413000,China;2.School of Physical Education,Hunan Normal University,Changsha 410081,China) Abstract: By adopting the form of identification task, the authors compared the characteristics of the duration of inhibition of return of players and ordinary college students. The experiment is a mixed “3x2x3” design. The inter group variables are tested group designations (16 basketball players, 16 trampoline players and 16 ordinary college students), while the inner group variables are target positions (clew provided position and none clew provided posi-tion) and the time interval from the beginning of clew provision to target appearance (SOA, 400, 600 and 800 ms). The authors revealed the following findings: basketball players, trampoline players and ordinary college students began to show inhibition of return at a SOA of 400, 800 and 600 ms respectively, which indicates that as compared with ordinary college students, basketball players showed a more powerful inhibition effect, can show inhibition of return in a shorter SOA, while trampoline players did not show the advantage of inhibition of return capacity, taking a longer SOA to show inhibition of return. Inhibition of return has a certain referential value for the mental selection as well as training monitoring and orientation of basketball players. |
下载本期全文:点击下载