| （1.首都体育学院 理论学部，北京 100088；2.首都体育学院 技术学部，北京，100088） 摘 要：比较中、美、日、英、俄、德6国体育学科研究生教育管理体制，指出各国因社会政治、经济、历史传统不同而组织形态各异，表现出不同的发展特点与变革轨迹，提出当前在体制上扬长避短、权力上不断均权的趋势下，我国体育学科研究生教育管理应理顺政府和体育院校的关系，调整体育学科研究生的培养目标和办学体系，运用市场机制调节教育经费的投入与运行，寻求“产学研”一体化的道路。 |
HAO Xiao-cen1，YIN Jun2
| （1.Department of Theoretical Academic，Capital Institute of Physical Education，Beijing 100088，China；2.Department of Technical Academic，Capital Institute of Physical Education，Beijing 100088，China） Abstract: The authors compared the physical education majoring postgraduate education management systems used in China, the United States, Japan, Britain, Russia and Germany, pointed out that the organizational forms of the systems used in the said countries are different due to differences in social polity, economy and historical tradition, showing different development characteristics and reform tracks, and put forward the following opinions: under the trend that the system is increasingly improved and the power is constantly balanced today, for the physical education majoring postgraduate education management in China, we should sort out the relation between the government and physical education institutes, regulate physical education majoring postgraduate cultivation objectives and the edu-cation management system, adjust the input and use of educational funds by applying the market mechanism, and seek for a “production, study and research” integrated way. |
下载本期全文：点击下载