| （首都体育学院 体育社会与经济教研室，北京 100088） 摘 要：通过对自甘风险的类型、判断标准的介绍，以案例分析自甘风险原则对我国侵权法的价值。“自甘风险”是不同于“同意”的抗辩，与体育发展之大背景契合，在体育伤害侵权领域，引入自甘风险原则有助于弥补当前我国民法理论中受害人同意及有过失所不能完全涵盖的不足，有一定的适用空间。可以借鉴欧美侵权法的做法，将次要的默示自甘风险纳入作为责任分担事由的受害人过失制度，不再单独做出规定，而仅对明示的自甘风险和主要的默示自甘风险作为一种免责事由进行规定。 |
HAN Yong
| （Department of Sports Society and Economic，Capital Institute of Physical Education，Beijing 100088，China） Abstract: By introducing the types and judgment standards of assumption of risks, based on cases the author ana-lyzed the value of the principle of assumption of risks for the tort law implemented in China. The “assumption of risks” is the defense for that it is different from “consent”, fitting into the grand background of sport development; in the area of sports injury torts, introducing the principle of assumption of risks is conducive to making up defi-ciencies which cannot be fully covered by victim consents and faults in theories about civil laws implemented in China today, provided a certain space for application. We can, by referring to the practices of tort laws implemented in Europe and America, put implied assumption of risks into the victim fault system used as the ground for liability specification without making separate specifications, yet specify explicit assumption of risks as the ground for li-ability exemption. |
下载本期全文：点击下载