| （山东政法学院 经济贸易法学院，山东 济南 250014） 摘 要：体育赛事协议常常设定限制责任条款，以此减轻或免除赛事组织者的责任。在参赛运动员受到人身伤害时，他(她)可以选择以侵权责任或违约责任为由提出救济。如果提起侵权责任诉讼，则对方当事人可以用合同约定的限制责任条款内容抗辩，由此导致违约责任和侵权责任的竞合。对于用合同内容抗辩侵权责任的效力，我国立法没有明确规定。借鉴各国的立法和司法实践，我国应当允许当事人以合同条款的内容对侵权责任提出抗辩，以有利于民事纠纷的解决，体现法律的公平原则，但应当根据体育赛事的具体情况和法律原则对限制责任条款的法律效力做出正确判断，维护运动员的合法权益。 |
WANG Li-wu
| （School of Economic and Trade Law，Shandong Institute of Political Science and Law，Jinan 250014，China） Abstract: Responsibility restriction provisions are usually established in sports game participation agreements to reduce or exempt responsibilities of game organizers. When a game participating athlete is physically inured, he or she can choose to demand for a relief for reason of the responsibility for right violation or contract breaching. If a lawsuit about the responsibility for right violation is filed, the counter party can use responsibility restriction provi-sions agreed in the contract to make an argument, thus resulting in the concurrence of responsibilities for contract breaching and right violation. In legislations of China there is no clearly specified stipulation on the effect of argu-ing the responsibility for right violation by using contract contents. By referring to legislations and judicial practice of other countries, China allows the counter party to make an argument about the responsibility for right violation by using the content of contract provisions, so as to facilitate the settlement of civil disputes, and to embody the princi-ple of legal fairness, but a correct judgment on the legal effect of responsibility restriction provisions should be made according to specific circumstances of sports games and legal principles, so as to protection lawful rights and interests of athletes. |
下载本期全文：点击下载