(1.广州体育学院,广东 广州 510500;2.上海体育学院 体育教育训练学院,上海 200438) 摘 要:对目前CBA运动员人力资本所有权界定的现状及原因,以及所有权为什么要唯一界定给运动员进行研究。结果表明:CBA运动员人力资本所有权不属于运动员;运动员注册转会制度及无形资产开发方面的制度不完善导致所有权未能归属运动员本人。建议遵循公平性、激励性、客观性等原则,完善CBA运动员注册转会和运动员无形资产开发方面的制度,实现运动员人力资本所有权载体化。 |
XU Yong-gang1,LI Hua2
(1.Guangzhou Sport University,Guangzhou 510500,China;2.School of Training and Physical Education,Shanghai Sports University,Shanghai 200438,China) Abstract: By means of literature data, the authors studied the current state of and reasons for the definition of hu-man capital of current CBA players, as well as why the proprietorship of human capital of the players should be de-fined uniquely, and revealed the following findings: the proprietorship of human capital of the players does not be-long to the players themselves, which is caused by the incompleteness of the player registration and transfer system and intangible asset development systems. The authors suggested completing the player registration and transfer system and intangible asset development systems and realizing the carrier of the proprietorship of human capital of the players in a fair, stimulative and objective way. |
下载本期全文:点击下载