| （1.浙江工商大学 WTO与法制研究中心，浙江 杭州 310035；2.复旦大学 法学院，上海 200433） 摘 要：我国对奥林匹克标志采用民事和行政双轨制保护模式。在对待奥林匹克标志知识产权的态度、发起保护的方式、权利人获得实际利益和保护过程等方面民事保护和行政保护都存在较大区别。就两种保护模式的发展趋势而言，行政保护在整体上不断强化，奥林匹克权利人更加倾向于使用行政保护而非民事司法保护，我国专利法在设定行政保护制度时就明确了其地位和作用。从国际知识产权保护的发展趋势看，行政保护在完成其历史使命后应当由更为完善的民事和刑事司法保护形式代替。 |
HU Feng1，LIU Qiang2
| （1.WTO and Legal System Research Center，Zhejiang University of Industry and Commerce，Hangzhou 310035，China；2.Law College，Fudan University，Shanghai 200433，China） Abstract: In China both civil and administrative protection modes are applicable to the Olympic logo. There are significant differences between civil protection and administrative protection in terms of the attitude towards intel-lectual property of the Olympic logo, the way to initiate protection, the actual benefit gained by the patent owner, and the protection process. In terms of the trend of development of these two protection modes, overall administra-tive protection are constantly strengthened, the Olympic patent owner tends more toward using administrative pro-tection than toward using civil judicial protection, and when the administrative protection system was established in the patent law of China its status and functions were clearly specified. From the perspective of the trend of devel-opment of international intellectual property protection, administrative protection should be replaced with the more perfected form of civil and judicial protection after it has completed its historical mission. |
下载本期全文：点击下载