| （华中师范大学 体育学院，湖北 武汉 430079） 摘要：在考察体育仲裁院司法监督机制的基础上，认为在现行《仲裁法》框架下，体育仲裁的监督机制应包括内部监督、行业监督和司法监督3种形式。在体育仲裁监督机制的设计过程中应注意仲裁实践中人民法院对于仲裁裁决的双重监督、双重审查和双重标准以及仲裁裁决被错误地撤销或不予执行后，当事人缺乏必要的救济途径等问题，提出在体育仲裁委员会内部设立监督机构，加强内部监督；在体育仲裁裁决的司法审查上仅规定撤销仲裁裁决制度；人民法院对于体育仲裁裁决的司法审查应以程序审查为限，除非涉及“公共利益”；统一国内与涉外体育仲裁的司法审查范围和在《体育仲裁条例》立法中赋予体育仲裁机构异议权等构建体育仲裁监督机制的建议。 关 键 词：体育仲裁； 监督机制； 司法监督 中图分类号：G80-05 文献标识码：A 文章编号：1006-7116(2007)01-0122-04 |
CHEN Yuan-xin, WANG Jian
| College of Physical Education，Central China Normal University，Wuhan 430079，China) Abstract: Based on their observation on the juridical supervision mechanism of the sports arbitration court, the au-thors considered that under the framework of the existing Arbitration Law, a sport arbitration supervision mecha-nism should include such three forms as internal supervision, industrial supervision and juridical supervision. Dur-ing the design of a sports arbitration supervision mechanism, attention should be paid to such issues as the party concerned being lack of necessary relief channels after the double supervision, double examination, double standard or arbitration decision of the People’s Court is wrongly discharged or not executed in arbitration practice. The author put forward the following suggestions for constructing a sports arbitration supervision mechanism: A supervision mechanism should be established within the Sports Arbitration Committee to strengthen internal supervision; only the arbitration decision discharging system should be specified for judicial review of sports arbitration decisions; the judicial review of sports arbitration decisions executed by the People’s Court should be limited to procedure review except that “public interests” are involved with; the range of judicial review of domestic and foreign party involved sports arbitration should be unified; the sports arbitration institution should be given the right to object in the legis-lation of Sport Arbitration Rules. |
下载本期全文：点击下载