| （1.华中师范大学 体育学院，湖北 武汉430079； 2.中南财经政法大学 体育部，湖北 武汉430074） 摘要：对《学生体质健康标准》的选测项目进行研究和分析后发现：台阶实验和1 000 m(800 m)跑项目测试结果差异性大、相关性低，二者评分标准不统一，评分标准偏低，各得分段成绩间距分布不符合评价标准的正态分布规律。结论:台阶试验指数反映耐力的有效性低，不能正确反映人体心肺功能，把台阶实验和1 000 m(800 m)任选其一作为心功能评价指标而对个体进行综合评价缺乏科学性、合理性。 关键词：学生体质健康标准； 台阶试验； 心功能指标 中图分类号：G81137文献标识码：A文章编号：1006-7116(2006)05-0142-03 |
MA Qi1， LIU Hao2， YU Zhuxian1
| （1.College of Physical Education，Central China Normal University，Wuhan 430079，China；2.Department of Physical Education，Zhongnan University of Finance and Laws，Wuhan 430074，China) Abstract:By applying literature data method and mathematical statistic method,the authors studied and analyzed optional test items in Student Physical Health Standard,and reveal the following findings: There is a big difference and low correlativity between the test results of step test and 1 000 m/800 m run;the scoring standards for these two tests are not unified;the scoring standards are kind of low;the distribution of score spans of various score segments does not in conformity with the pattern of normal distribution. The authors drew the following conclusions:Step test index has a poor performance in reflecting endurance effectively,and cannot reflect cardio-pulmonary functions of the human body correctly; it lacks in scientific and rational basis to select either step test or 1 000 m/800 m run as the cardio-pulmonary function evaluation index and thus carry out comprehensive evaluation on an individual. |
下载本期全文：点击下载