(清华大学 体育部,北京 100084) 摘 要:采用跨国史视角对现代体育进行研究,弥补传统体育史研究的不足。体育跨国史研 究的意义在于否定“欧洲中心论”和“文明例外论”。通过探索体育跨国史研究的方法与实践,表 明从跨国视角审视体育项目发展、体育网络的构建、体育在地化的转译,可以补充以往民族国家 体育史研究的不足,书写具有国际视野的民族国家体育史。针对学术界已有对体育全球史的理论 探讨,比较体育跨国史与体育全球史异同。研究认为,通过对体育跨国史概念、内涵、价值的全 面阐释,中国学术界完全有能力构建体育跨国史话语体系,掌握学术话语权,这符合为中国走向 世界舞台培养具有世界眼光与胸怀的历史观。 关 键 词:体育跨国史;体育全球史;现代体育;欧洲中心论;文明例外论 中图分类号:G80-05 文献标志码:A 文章编号:1006-7116(2022)06-0001-09 |
RU Yawei,ZENG Yunjing,LIU Bo
(Department of Physical Education,Tsinghua University,Beijing 100084,China) Abstract: Based The study analyses the modern sports from the perspective of transnational history to make up for the drawback of traditional sports history. The significance of transnational history of sports aim to deny "Eurocentrism" and "civilization exceptionalism". By exploring the methods and practices of transnational history of sports, it is shown that the study of sports events development, sports network construction and local sports translation from a transnational perspective can supplement the drawback of previous studies on the history of nation-state perspective. In view of the existing theoretical discussion on the global history of sports in the academic world, this paper compares the similarities and differences between the transnational history of sports and the global history of sports. It is concluded that Chinese academic community is fully capable of constructing the theoretical transnational history of sports and having the academic discourse through the comprehensive interpretation of the concept, connotation and value of the transnational history of sports, which also meet the demand of cultivating the historical view with global vision for China's stepping into the world stage. Keywords: transnational history of sports;global history of sports;modern sports;Eurocentrism;civilization exceptionalism |
下载本期全文:点击下载