| （江西财经大学，江西 南昌 330013） 摘 要：通过比较国内体育院校和院系的办学规模和学科专业建设的相关数据，可以发现我国体育院校和院系的总体规模有限、办学类型单一，受社会欢迎的程度不高。通过对比美国和欧洲体育相关院系的数量名称等数据，可以发现我国体育院校和院系的办学存在着自我封闭和孤立、较少与其他学科融合的问题。体育学科是体育院校和院系发展的龙头，体育类专业如果不能主动融入社会，体育学科如果不能积极融入其他学科，体育学的整体发展就无从谈起。 |
YI Jian-dong
| （Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics，Nanchang 330013，China) Abstract: By comparing related data of sport institutes and departments in China, the author found that sport insti-tutes and developments in China had a limited overall scale, an undiversified education management style, and a low degree of social popularity. By comparing with the data of US and European sport related institutes and depart-ments such as their names etc, the author found education management conducted by sport institutes and depart-ments in China had such a problem as self reclusion and isolation, seldom blending with other disciplines. Sport dis-cipline is the lead discipline in the development sport institutes and developments; if physical education majors fail to blend into the society initiatively, or if sport discipline fails to blend into other disciplines actively, there will be no way to talk about the overall development of sport science. |
下载本期全文：点击下载