(华南师范大学 体育科学学院,广东 广州 510006) 摘 要:对洛克和颜元的体育目的论进行了比较。研究认为:德智体三育并重和将体育作为培养学生精神品质重要手段,是二者的相同之处;但颜元较重视身心一元的目标,用以培养文武兼备与身心合一的健全国民,而洛克强调培养具有健壮体魄与良好教养的资产阶级实业家,为新兴资产阶级的社会精英服务。二者体育思想产生的文化背景的差异,决定了二者体育思想不同的历史命运及影响。 |
HAN Shu-yan,TAN Hua
(School of Physical Education,South China Normal University,Guangzhou 510006,China) Abstract: The authors compared the theories about the purpose of physical education by Locke and YAN Yuan, and drew the following conclusions: considering moral education, intellectual education and physical education equally important and using physical education as an important means to cultivate students’ mental characters are common ideas of Locke and YAN Yuan; but YAN Yuan focused more on the objective of physical and mental unification, which was used to cultivate culturally and physically well educated as well as physically and mentally unified sound nationals, while Locke emphasized cultivating physically robust and well educated bourgeois industrialists and serving emerging bourgeois social elites. The difference between cultural backgrounds for the generation of physical education ideologies of Locke and YAN Yuan determined different historical destinies and influences of their physical education ideologies. |
下载本期全文:点击下载