| （北京师范大学 法学院，北京 100875） 摘 要：对于国际体育组织规章的法律性质，国内观点有国际习惯说、其他国际法渊源说、国际惯例说和合同说等不同观点。但国际体育组织规章因其在实践中的作用及影响力的不同，不能一概而论。《世界反兴奋剂规则》和“奥运停战”已成了国际习惯，大多数国际体育组织规章属于国际惯例，《奥林匹克宪章》等其他的国际体育组织规章则仅具有合同性质。作为国际惯例的国际体育组织规章可在中国法院得到直接适用，属于涉外合同性质的国际体育组织规章，则必须由法院依据可适用的法律来判断其有效性。 |
PEI Yang
| （School of Law，Beijing Normal University，Beijing 100875，China） Abstract: About the legal nature of the regulations of international sports organizations, Chinese scholars have dif-ferent views, such as the international custom theory, the other sources of the international law theory, the interna-tional practices theory, and the contract theory. However, since the functions and influences of the regulations of in-ternational sports organizations in practice are different, their legal nature can not be generalized. The World Anti-Doping Code and the Olympic Truce have become international customs; most of the regulations of interna-tional sports organizations are international practices; other regulations of international sports organizations, such as the Olympic Charter, are provided only with the contract nature. Those regulations of international sports organiza-tions that are used as international practices can be directly applied in courts in China, while the validity of those regulations of international sports organizations that have a foreign contract attribute must be determined by courts according to applicable laws. |
下载本期全文：点击下载