(山东大学 体育学院,山东 济南 250100) 摘 要:根据康德的哲学与教育学观点,结合目前美国学校两种主导型体育课程与教学模式——健身教育与竞技教育,就为何要实施这两种模式教学,以及如何在教育环境实施这两种模式教学作了探讨。明确指出,健身教育就是针对身体的自然性教育,竞技教育就是通过身体的道德性教育。按照自然律与道德律的法则,提出以竞技教育为基础统一健身教育于教育实践中的结论。 |
WANG Xue-feng
(College of Physical Education,Shandong University,Jinan 250100,China) Abstract: According to Kant’s philosophical and pedagogical views, and by combing with such two dominating US scholastic physical education curriculum and teaching modes as fitness education and competitive education, the author probed into why to implement these two teaching modes, and how to implement these two teaching modes in an educational environment, and clearly drew the following conclusions: fitness education is a natural education for the human body, while competitive education is a moral education via the human body; fitness education should be integrated into educational practice based on competitive education and by following the rules of natural law and moral law. |
下载本期全文:点击下载