(山东体育学院 体育社会科学系,山东 日照 276826) 摘 要:回顾分析我国已举办的“十佳劳伦斯冠军奖”评奖过程,对其提出几点质疑:1)“十佳劳伦斯冠军奖”不纯粹是群众性的,而是集“专家奖”“群众奖”“政府奖”“媒体奖”于一身,协调困难;2)“年度人气奖”与“最佳运动员”互相覆盖,且用短信投票,对弱势群体不公平;3)网络投票缺乏民主、公平,存在诸多舞弊现象;4)颁奖典礼过分娱乐化,体育明星成了歌星的配角;5)在社会公益上“十佳劳伦斯冠军奖”缺乏作为。 |
WANG Qing-zhong
(Department of Sports Social Science,Shandong Institute of Physical Education,Rizhao 276826,China) Abstract: The author reviewed and analyzed the process of evaluation of the “Ten Laurence Championships Award” bestowed in China, and raised a few queries about it:1)the “Ten Laurence Championships Award” is not purely a mass award, but the integration of “export award”, “mass award”, “government award” and “media award”,so it is hard to harmonize; 2)the “Annual Publicity Award” and “Best Athlete Award” are overlapped and voted via short messages, which is not fair for disadvantageous groups of people; 3)network voting is lacking in democracy and fairness, causing a lot of frauds; 4)the Laurence award bestowing ceremony is too entertainment orientated, thus sports stars become the supporting roles of music stars; 5)the “Ten Laurence Championships Award” failed to play a role in social welfare. |
下载本期全文:点击下载